-
-
Recent News:
- Seven Years On September 4, 2025
- New Case Summary Page February 27, 2025
- Indiana State Police: Records Suppressed February 14, 2025
- Evidentiary Hearing Day 5: The Speck of Blood November 17, 2024
- Evidentiary Hearing: Day 4 October 19, 2024
- Evidentiary Hearing: Day 3 October 18, 2024
- Evidentiary Hearing: Day 2 October 17, 2024
- Evidentiary Hearing Begins October 16, 2024
- “A Political Seizure of Power” October 2, 2024
- Evidentiary Hearing Delayed September 23, 2024
-
Labels:
2015 Amber Garrett capital punishment Chillicothe Correctional Institution criminal justice death penalty death row Eric Horn evidentiary hearing execution drugs executions Governor Kasich Governor Mike DeWine Hamilton County Indiana injustice innocence Jeffrey Wogenstahl Jeff Wogenstahl Joe Deters jurisdiction jurors lethal-injection drugs lethal injections midazolam miscarriages of justice official misconduct Ohio Ohioans to Stop Executions Ohio Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Ohio Supreme Court oral argument Peggy Garrett prosecutorial misconduct prosecutor misconduct prosecutors subject-matter jurisdiction suppressed evidence Supreme Court of Ohio Terry Collins torture USA US Supreme Court wrongful conviction wrongful convictions
We also support:
Translate this page

Tag Archives: eyewitnesses
Evidentiary Hearing: Day 4
Jeffrey Wogenstahl’s evidentiary hearing concluded for the week on Friday, October 18. It will continue at a later date, when more witnesses will be available. On Friday (Day 4) a psychologist specializing in attention, perception and memory testified about the … Continue reading
Likelihood of False Identification
Dr. Harvey G. Shulman, PhD, an expert in eyewitness behavior and accuracy, has highlighted flawed police procedures and other factors that increased the chances of false identification by the eyewitnesses who testified at Jeffrey Wogenstahl’s trial. Shulman’s report is contained … Continue reading
Eyewitness Misidentification
At the time of Jeffrey Wogenstahl’s trial the law had not yet embraced the concerns about eye witness identification that scientists had been highlighting for years. It was only when DNA exonerations flagged up the prevalence of misidentification even when … Continue reading