-
Recent News:
- A Dirty Secret October 12, 2017
- A Terrible Old Rule September 26, 2017
- More Victims and More Grieving Families September 10, 2017
- Move to Toledo Abandoned September 1, 2017
- The Majority Judges Erred August 14, 2017
- Chief Justice O’Connor’s Detailed Appraisal August 1, 2017
- Ronald Phillips: Breakdown of Criminal Justice July 17, 2017
- Jeff’s Jurors Reconsider June 30, 2017
- Amber’s Disappearance: Evidence Suppressed June 14, 2017
- Other Suspects: Extensive Suppression of Evidence May 28, 2017
We also support:
Translate this page
Tag Archives: June 2016
Important and Troubling Implications
The judges at the Ohio Supreme Court have two separate filings from Jeffrey Wogenstahl before them. One, a jurisdiction claim (that Jeff’s trial should not have been held in Ohio, but in Indiana) has resulted in his stay of execution and the … Continue reading
Posted in capital punishment, criminal justice, death penalty, FBI hair testimony, flawed forensics, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Ohio, USA
Tagged capital punishment, death penalty, FBI hair evidence, FBI Testimony on Microscopic Hair Analysis, flawed forensics, flawed hair testimony, Indiana, injustice, innocence, Innocence Project, Jeff Wogenstahl, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, June 2016, Martin Pinales, MCHA Review, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Ohio, Ohio Supreme Court, USA, wrongful convictions
“Motion to recuse denied.”
Ohio Supreme Court Justice O’Neill has made it clear that he will not grant a request to remove himself from Jeffrey Wogenstahl’s case. The judge explained: “…it would be a violation of my oath of office to ignore my obligation to … Continue reading
Posted in capital punishment, criminal justice, death penalty, Indiana, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Joe Deters, jurisdiction, Justice O'Neill, Ohio, USA
Tagged capital punishment, death penalty, Indiana, Innocence Project, Jeff Wogenstahl, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Joe Deters, June 2016, jurisdiction, Justice Breyer, Justice Ginsburg, Justice William O'Neill, Ohio, Ohio Supreme Court, prosecutorial misconduct, recusal, US Supreme Court, USA, wrongful convictions
