-
Recent News:
- Guilt, Shame and Mental Torment November 5, 2019
- A Disturbing Ruling October 1, 2019
- Ohio Officials Reflect August 30, 2019
- Eric Horn: Not Lured Away July 31, 2019
- Wogenstahl is actually innocent. June 27, 2019
- The US Supreme Court’s Exceptional Barbarity May 29, 2019
- Joe Deters’ Omissions April 30, 2019
- Conservatives Opposing the Death Penalty March 31, 2019
- Cruel and Unusual Punishment February 28, 2019
- Do they deserve to kill? January 20, 2019
We also support:
Translate this page
Tag Archives: June 2016
Important and Troubling Implications
The judges at the Ohio Supreme Court have two separate filings from Jeffrey Wogenstahl before them. One, a jurisdiction claim (that Jeff’s trial should not have been held in Ohio, but in Indiana) has resulted in his stay of execution and the … Continue reading
Posted in capital punishment, criminal justice, death penalty, FBI hair testimony, flawed forensics, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Ohio, USA
Tagged capital punishment, death penalty, FBI hair evidence, FBI Testimony on Microscopic Hair Analysis, flawed forensics, flawed hair testimony, Indiana, injustice, innocence, Innocence Project, Jeff Wogenstahl, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, June 2016, Martin Pinales, MCHA Review, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Ohio, Ohio Supreme Court, USA, wrongful convictions
1 Comment
“Motion to recuse denied.”
Ohio Supreme Court Justice O’Neill has made it clear that he will not grant a request to remove himself from Jeffrey Wogenstahl’s case. The judge explained: “…it would be a violation of my oath of office to ignore my obligation to … Continue reading
Posted in capital punishment, criminal justice, death penalty, Indiana, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Joe Deters, jurisdiction, Justice O'Neill, Ohio, USA
Tagged capital punishment, death penalty, Indiana, Innocence Project, Jeff Wogenstahl, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Joe Deters, June 2016, jurisdiction, Justice Breyer, Justice Ginsburg, Justice William O'Neill, Ohio, Ohio Supreme Court, prosecutorial misconduct, recusal, US Supreme Court, USA, wrongful convictions
1 Comment
