-
Recent News:
- Jurisdiction Ruling: a Reassuring Footnote June 9, 2020
- Will Ohio’s Death Penalty End? March 8, 2020
- More Good News January 25, 2020
- Encouraging News December 22, 2019
- Guilt, Shame and Mental Torment November 5, 2019
- A Disturbing Ruling October 1, 2019
- Ohio Officials Reflect August 30, 2019
- Eric Horn: Not Lured Away July 31, 2019
- Wogenstahl is actually innocent. June 27, 2019
- The US Supreme Court’s Exceptional Barbarity May 29, 2019
We also support:
Translate this page
Tag Archives: January 2017
Oral Argument: April 4, 2017
Tuesday, April 4, 2017 will be an important day for Jeffrey Wogenstahl. Oral argument has been scheduled for that day,* to consider whether his Ohio trial court lacked jurisdiction to try him (Jeff has a strong case that because the … Continue reading
Posted in capital punishment, criminal justice, death penalty, Indiana, injustice, innocence, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, jurisdiction, Ohio, oral argument, USA, wrongful conviction
Tagged 1993, capital punishment, death penalty, Hamilton County, Indiana, injustice, innocence, January 2017, Jeff Wogenstahl, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, jurisdiction, Ohio, Ohio Supreme Court, oral argument, prosecutorial misconduct, subject-matter jurisdiction, suppressed evidence, trial, USA, wrongful conviction
Peggy Garrett: Impeached Testimony
Before her death Amber Garrett, the 10 year-old victim in Jeffrey Wogenstahl’s case, was suffering at the hands of her mother. Suppressed police records contain Amber’s school journal entry*, written days before her murder, in which she described a vicious … Continue reading
Posted in capital punishment, criminal justice, death penalty, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Ohio, testimony, USA
Tagged Amber Garrett, capital punishment, child abuse, criminal justice, death penalty, hypnosis, impeached testimony, injustice, January 2017, Jeff Wogenstahl, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Ohio, Peggy Garrett, perjured testimony, police records, suppressed evidence, unreliable witness, USA
2 Comments
Burning at the Stake
Ohio has introduced a lethal injection protocol as cruel and unusual as “burning at the stake, crucifixion, and breaking on the wheel” (examples of punishments which the US constitution forbids as cruel and unusual). The state is emboldened by a … Continue reading
Posted in capital punishment, criminal justice, death penalty, execution drugs, executions, Glossip v. Gross, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, lethal-injection drugs, midazolam
Tagged 2017, anesthetic, capital punishment, criminal justice, death penalty, executions, Glossip v. Gross, January 2017, Jeff Wogenstahl, Jeffrey Wogenstahl, Justice Sotomayor, lethal injections, lethal-injection drugs, lethal-injection protocol, midazolam, Ohio, Oklahoma, torture, USA
